Acumatica ↔ external integration regression
For technical and integration leads · Scoped credentials per integration
Acumatica integrations with Shopify, EDI, WMS, CRM, and payment gateways break silently on upgrade. Your customer finds out when orders stop flowing — and those are the angriest tickets.
You get. Regression checks against the integration endpoints, run on every Acumatica release and every configuration change. The engagement starts with one named integration pair proven end-to-end, then expands.
Starts after in-tenant scenarios exist — one reference integration green before adding endpoints.
I gate API-layer scenarios through the same pipeline as tenant config.
how it works
Same loop under every offer: version → rebuild → exercise → report.
Nothing installs inside Acumatica. Nothing for you to keep running.
- Demo without the afternoon rebuild
- Minutes, not a day: clean company, linked transactions already in it — same rebuild next week when the pitch goes sideways.
- See what is actually configured
- Live tenant extracted to Git; agreed config versus live, sandbox versus production — ranked lists, no writes.
- Catch breakage before production
- Business scenarios on an upgraded copy. Failures name the step — not a customer on the phone.
- Cutover becomes a rehearsal
- Rebuild, load, exercise, recon, tear down — repeat until go-live is boring and the controller has a trail.
Work product stays in your repo. Read-only work only reads; release and cutover never touch production until the SOW says so. Hosted tenants use what you already have; full rebuilds need a lab you control — every engagement states which — and your Acumatica version is pinned.